That does not require a singular, unifying source, that's just emergent habits based upon common material context.Ģ) Read up on more kinds of megalithic monument, and other works besides. You are sitting on a sphere in space, it's not hard to align anything to 'the cosmos' in the first place, and even if we accept that such sites are - which for many, it should be note, it has been fringe speculation or the pet project of astronomers who have run away with themselves while not knowing the actual archaeology on the ground - it is entirely, readily possible for people in entirely separate contexts and cultures to think that matching their place of significance to something in the sky would help enhance the meaning of the site. Also if you're gonna pull the 'all the megalithic sites around the world are mostly attuned to the cosmos too' thing, I would like to raise two points:ġ) Raise specifics, not abstracts, if you're going to try and match them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |